Saturday, August 19, 2017
Sunday, June 4, 2017
Ghitis: Trump has finally gone too far
Frida Ghitis is a world affairs columnist for The Miami Herald and World Politics Review, and a former CNN producer and correspondent. The views expressed in this commentary are her own.
(CNN)Is it even possible for the United States to lead the world with Donald Trump as president? We'll know the answer in the coming months, as Trump attempts to discard every ideal and principle that gave the United States a unique place in history, even as others in the country -- including state and corporate leaders -- roll up their sleeves and work to prevent him from dismantling the work of his predecessors.
What we do know is that the time has come to retire the term "leader of the free world" when speaking of President Trump. It was a title once bestowed upon -- and earned -- by the men who held the presidency. Perhaps it will be again under another president.
To be sure, American leadership has never been perfect. The country has long struggled to balance its ideals, its interests, and the realities of a complicated world. It has often made grievous mistakes. But until Donald Trump moved into the White House, American presidents made a genuine effort to lead not only the country but the world in a direction that was generally consistent with its values. No more.
It's not just Trump's latest decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris climate agreement -- a pact that 194 other nations have signed. That was only the latest in a continuing stream of decisions by Trump and his top deputies to turn aside our nation's place as a beacon of progress, stability, and global stewardship.
Trump exits Paris climate accord 05:44
No, besides Trump's move to isolate the United States from the rest of the planet on the climate issue, he has weakened the alliance that was born back in the days when the term "Free World" referred to the part of the planet not under communist rule during the great contest between communism and democracy.
Indeed, from the moment Trump was elected, German Chancellor Angela Merkel made it clear that the close relationship between the two countries was contingent on respect for common values. Now, America's European allies, particularly after Trump's recent meetings with NATO and the G7, say they are not sure they can trust Washington. Instead of strengthening this key alliance, Trump has sharpened its divisions.
If America's allies are openly questioning US leadership, how can our President claim the title of Leader of the Free World?
The United States (and its President) first became the leader of the so-called Free World during the Cold War, when President Harry S. Truman decided that the country would stand for more than its own narrow interests and work to support freedom. But the philosophy that turned America into a world leader dates much earlier, to the founding days of the republic, a time when individuals with a daunting sense of history grappled with profound questions. This new nation would become a torch-bearer, a beacon to peoples everywhere, who would see their aspirations come to life in America's daring experiment in democracy.
The whole world was watching and the young United States became a global leader, a trend-setter, a shaper of ideas that resonated across continents.
Staff mum on if Trump believes climate change 00:54
The notions of individual freedom, a free press, true democracy, have not always been easy to defend in a world full of threats. But US diplomats have sought to bring them into the equation. Now Trump's diplomats have been instructed to move away from that. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson recently told his diplomatic staff that US foreign policy should separate "the way people are treated," from US foreign policy. Here we are talking about human rights.
It was a dispiriting declaration, announcing to the world that Washington won't much care about them, nor democracy and the rule of law. And it was a sharp turn from the trends of the past few decades.
When Russian propagandists started disrupting elections in the US and Europe, Trump didn't object. It fell to French President Emmanuel Macron to stand up boldly for a free press. This week, with Russian President Vladimir Putin by his side, an undaunted Macron called out the Russian "news" agencies RT and Sputnik as "agents of influence and propaganda."
In the aftermath of the two great wars of the 20th century, Washington also took the lead in developing international institutions, creating groupings, such as the United Nations, that aimed to bring together every country on Earth to tackle common problems, such as climate change.
Under Trump, "America First" seems to mean goodbye to that kind of global leadership.
How isolated is the US becoming in this new abdication? This week offered a stunning accounting: In the entire world, only two other countries are not part of the Paris Climate deal. One is war-ravaged Syria. The other is Nicaragua, whose government refused to sign in protest because it found the pact too weak in its protection against climate change. What a club: Syria, Nicaragua... and the United States!
As CNN's "GPS" host Fareed Zakaria put it Thursday in a discussion of Trump's abandonment of his presidential mantle of "leader of the free world": "For a young presidency, it is already the single most irresponsible act that this President has taken."
By moving America out of the Paris deal -- a process that could take years, an intriguing prospect considering the investigations dogging the Trump administration -- Trump is tapping the brakes on what had been America's surging leadership in clean energy innovation. He's doing it under the pretext of saving American jobs. But the argument does not stand up to scrutiny, and evidence is all around. Consider, for one example, the technological and manufacturing leaps of companies such as Tesla, the electric car maker, now the country's most valuable car manufacturer.
Fareed: No constraints means dirty energy 01:25
Now, instead of supplying key government support for the technological developments that have dazzled the world as American individuals and businesses have reached toward the future, under Trump, the government will act as an impediment to progress.
Trump claims he will work to come up with a better climate deal. That is a doubtful proposition. So far, he has not even managed to establish leadership in the global nationalist movement, which his campaign had flirted with so alarmingly. Since he was elected, the far-right in Europe has instead gone on a losing streak, with voters troubled by what they see happening in America. That is good news.
If there is any consolation in all of this it is that, while Trump is no longer leader of the free world, America -- the country and its people -- has not fully abdicated. American institutions are still working to promote individual rights, democracy, rule of law, freedom of expression, and protection of the environment through innovation.
The President is moving in one direction, but the entire country is not following. Quite the opposite. Trump's reversal of US policies has energized those fighting to preserve them. Trump has lost the title, but many Americans are still determined to promote the values that made the United States a global leader.
Tuesday, January 31, 2017
Obama Urges Americans To Protest Donald Trump Order
On Jan. 18, President Barack Obama told reporters in his final news conference that he would comment on his successor's actions only at "certain moments where I think our core values may be at stake."
He managed to stay quiet for less than two weeks.
Obama, who is still on vacation with his family after leaving office this month, issued a statement through his spokesman Monday encouraging Americans to publicly protest President Donald Trump's move to ban citizens from seven majority-Muslim countries - as well as refugees from across the globe - from entering the United States.
He also contested Trump's claim that Friday's executive order was based in part on decisions made during his administration, including identifying the same seven countries as harboring terrorism threats and slowing the processing of visas for Iraqis after evidence surfaced that two Iraqis seeking resettlement had been linked to terrorist activity in their homeland.
With regard to comparisons to President Obama's foreign policy decisions, as we've heard before, the President fundamentally disagrees with the notion of discriminating against individuals because of their faith or religion," Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis said in a statement.
Obama's decision to speak out - after pledging to do so in rare instances - underscores the predicament he and many of his top advisers find themselves in just days after leaving the White House. While the president repeatedly emphasiEven Roosevelt told Taft after returning from a vacation overseas that while some progressives were disappointed with the new administration's direction, "I will make no speeches or say anything for two months. But I will keep my mind open . . . as I keep my mouth shut."
"I don't think it's very common at all for an ex-president to be commenting on the performance of his successor," presidential historian Robert Dallek said. "This current incumbent is so out of sync with what the normal behavior of a president is that it calls for ex-presidents to respond."
During his last news conference, Obama sketched out the criteria for what would prompt him to speak out as a private citizen. He said threats to some of the key ideas he championed - including tolerance for minorities, immigrants and political dissent, as well as the need for broad voter participation among Americans - could prompt him to weigh into the public discourse.
"I put in that category if I saw systematic discrimination being ratified in some fashion. I put in that category explicit or functional obstacles to people being able to vote, to exercise their franchise," he said. "I'd put in that category institutional efforts to silence dissent or the press. And for me, at least, I would put in that category efforts to round up kids who have grown up here, and for all practical purposes are American kids, and send them someplace else, when they love this country."
Several journalists put in requests for comment to Obama's office in the wake of the executive order, Lewis said, and while the former president is trying to take time off with his family, "he's reading the news like everyone else."
"Donald Trump's thrown a monkey wrench into those plans," Brinkley said, adding that while "he's not going to be getting into the nitty-gritty of the policy fights"or serving as "a Democratic Party operative," he's "going to have to stay very engaged" on a few key issues.
"He'll be a voice of dissent, but done in a calm and reassuring way," said Brinkley, a Rice University history professor. "There was no way Barack Obama could have stayed silent on this immigration ban."
The very structure of Obama's post-presidential office - which includes a few of his top White House communications aides - highlights the extent to which he is already positioning himself to engage in political advocacy.
Obama - who in his farewell address called on supporters to engage in political organizing to advance progressive goals - praised the idea Monday of Americans taking part in peaceful protests in the wake of the executive order.
"President Obama is heartened by the level of engagement taking place in communities around the country," Lewis said. "Citizens exercising their Constitutional right to assemble, organize and have their voices heard by their elected officials is exactly what we expect to see when American values are at stake."
Over the past year, Obama and several of his closest allies expressed concern that he had been unable to transfer the enthusiasm he generated onto either another political candidate or the Democratic Party more broadly. In recent weeks, however, liberals have managed to organize major protests on issues including women's rights and support for immigrants and those seeking asylum.
"What is notable about the grass-roots response to Trump has been is that it is exactly the response that President Obama called for in his farewell address," former White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer wrote in an email.
While Obama expressed his opposition to Trump's latest policy announcement in fairly diplomatic terms, other members of his former White House team have been more forceful in expressing their dismay.
Susan E. Rice, who served as Obama's national security adviser during his second term, could not contain her outrage at the idea that Trump gave his chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon a regular seat on the National Security Council's principals committee and that the director of national intelligence and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff would sit in only as needed
.Source : NDTV.
"
"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)